Monday, August 12, 2013

State v. Buckley (A-55-11; 069494)

The proffered seat belt and utility pole location evidence is irrelevant to and therefore inadmissible on the issue of “but for” causation under N.J.S.A.
2C:2-3(a)(1) and the question of Buckley’s awareness of the risk of his conduct under the first prong of N.J.S.A. 2C:2-3(c). 5-15-13